I agree with all of you! Except we are not in the position of being part of the press that has to decide whether something should or should not be aired. So on that, I come down on Tom's side that it is better to err on the side of providing more information rather than the press deciding what we will see.

When I was just out of college, I worked on a presidential campaign, and there were two great newsmen from the NYTimes aboard our plane, Max Frankel and Johnny (R.W.) Apple. I was curious at the time, and they amazed me with what thought they gave before writing their stories (even when I did not agree), giving much thought as to what the public needed to know, and what their role was, as they witnessed the events. Sure, it was just a campaign, but not so different from any news source that has to make choices about what to report. That's why I'm with Tom on this.