|
0 registered members (),
24,895
guests |
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51152
06/29/06 10:37 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,288
Gatowoman
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,288 |
I'm sure it will be a task for someone assigned to sift thru this...
Perhaps travel cannot prevent bigotry, but by demonstrating that all peoples cry, laugh, eat, worry, and die, it can introduce the idea that if we try and understand each other, we may even become friends ~~M. Angelou~~
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51153
06/29/06 11:46 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 842
McKeever
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 842 |
I am wondering how they chose the people to send to email to. Are you all platinum members? I responded to Andrea's information.
none
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51154
06/29/06 12:01 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,288
Gatowoman
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,288 |
Nope...just a plain ol' silver here ;)
Perhaps travel cannot prevent bigotry, but by demonstrating that all peoples cry, laugh, eat, worry, and die, it can introduce the idea that if we try and understand each other, we may even become friends ~~M. Angelou~~
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51155
06/29/06 12:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 15,174
KarenS
OP
Moderator
|
OP
Moderator
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 15,174 |
Ardis, have you signed up for email on the RSSC site? I was going to link you straight to it but the site is down for maintenance. Maybe they are adding to it?
Karen Live long and prosper
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51156
06/29/06 12:41 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,079
Leslie B
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,079 |
Seems weird also that you could take it multiple times. They never asked for an e-mail address or any identifier.
Also, if it is targeted then you shouldn't be able to click through from a link.
It was probably sent to all e-mail recipients - we've only got 7 days onboard, never acknowledged via the letter everyone was getting earlier in the year, so we are nobody on their loyalty chart.
Leslie
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51157
06/29/06 12:58 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 842
McKeever
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 842 |
Yes, my SE and I are both on Regents email list! Curiouser and curiouser.
none
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51158
06/29/06 01:13 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,115
cruiseluv
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,115 |
Originally posted by MarnaLou: I have never seen a survey that incorporates previous responders' comments into the choices and changes the selections on the fly like that. I have never either! I was very "distracted" by the prior respondents comments. Sorry, but I thought the survey didn't look very professional.
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51159
06/29/06 06:46 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 365
count Florida
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 365 |
We were away when the survey was sent out from RSSC, and might have missed it if not for this thread, so thanks again, Karen!
It is a very interesting survey, and if they read them and act on the common themes, it could be really great. It is a very well-designed survey, IMHO, in that there was good opportunity to input your ideas and preferences, not just choose between theirs! Very impressive. Now, time will tell.
[size=8]Too Many To List - 416� days & counting on Radisson/Regent, and 150+� days on 8 other lines, with one cruise booked next month on the Mariner, Miami to Honolulu 22 days
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51160
06/29/06 07:14 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,257
kirky5
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,257 |
I am on the email update list, but i used the link here because I never received it on my own
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51161
06/29/06 09:06 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,024
dolebludger
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,024 |
Got the survey two days ago and responded. I was curious that the first question asked what I considered to be luxury lines. and gave me about five lines to chose from. Problem was, two of the lines mentioned were (IMO) far from being luxury lines, and one I DO consider to have this status was left out. So I had some ammending to do! Other than that, the survey seemed useful. And on the same day, I received a RSSC mailing that actually contained cruise schedules and descriptions! Something the "image mailing" with the DVD sorely lacked. We retained this last mailing, instead of "trashing it" as we did the one with the DVD. And, today, I received ANOTHER RSSC mailing advertising a specific cruise. It seems like I receive an RSSC mailing about three times per week.
Folks, my wife Carol is running for our State House of Representatives -- for which she filed about two weeks ago. If I did not know before, I DO know now how expensive a direct mailing campaign can be! Some of her opponets have raised over $100,000 in contributions, while Carol has raised exactly $16.95 so far! So, as one with this matter staring him in the face, may I say that I wish RSSC would pull back a bit on both their direct mail ads AND their fares?
Thanks, Richard
"It's five o'clock somewhere."
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51162
06/30/06 03:19 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 524
Canadagal
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 524 |
Good Luck to Carol, Richard! I think it's great that she is running and willing to get involved. PS. I received the email but it was blank too as it came into my hotmail account so thanks for posting the link here on LCT Andrea. Pat
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51163
07/02/06 11:32 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6
nearly there
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6 |
I thought it was an interesting survey and complete it, but agree that the sampling methods (previous comments, etc.) seem a bit unorthodox. I hope that they are serious about understanding their customer's needs and wants...'cause the research methodology isn't going to work if it's someone PhD dissertation :)
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51164
07/04/06 03:46 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 27
ua549
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 27 |
Received and responded. The unfortunate part was that the responses available were quite limiting.
I think the results, no matter what they are, will not be valid.
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51165
07/04/06 04:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 15,174
KarenS
OP
Moderator
|
OP
Moderator
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 15,174 |
Welcome to the board ua549 :)
Karen Live long and prosper
|
|
|
Re: Regent survey email
#51166
07/05/06 02:17 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 259
NHcruisers
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 259 |
I took the survey and thought it was pretty good.
The underlying technology used in these dynamically changing questionaires in telephone surveys, web surveys has been around for a couple of years; there are quite a few software companies and consultancies that offer software toolkits or business services using these technologies. They are becoming increasing popular...and yes, the statistical analysis is a bit different on the back end.
Bill
|
|
|
|
|
|